From f2a864b2e1353f522a0b1d13310b42bbf61cf49e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: gered <gered@blarg.ca>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 10:21:11 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] to be consistent, we should be converting keys this way here
 too

---
 src/clj_jtwig/convert.clj | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/clj_jtwig/convert.clj b/src/clj_jtwig/convert.clj
index 56bff81..a70557f 100644
--- a/src/clj_jtwig/convert.clj
+++ b/src/clj_jtwig/convert.clj
@@ -15,9 +15,7 @@
          (.entrySet)
          (reduce
            (fn [m [k v]]
-             ; TODO: perhaps we should be doing (keyword k) instead? i don't like that it technically is not an
-             ;       exact conversion if we do it that way though, even if it is more idiomatic for clojure ...
-             (assoc m k (to-clojure v)))
+             (assoc m (to-clojure k) (to-clojure v)))
            {})))
 
   java.lang.Number
@@ -36,6 +34,10 @@
   (to-clojure [x]
     x)
 
+  clojure.lang.Keyword
+  (to-clojure [x]
+    x)
+
   java.lang.Object
   (to-clojure [x]
     (-> x
@@ -80,4 +82,4 @@
 (defn clojure->java
   "converts a clojure value to an equivalent value using a java object"
   [x]
-  (to-java x))
+  (to-java x))
\ No newline at end of file