to be consistent, we should be converting keys this way here too

src/clj_jtwig/convert.clj

@@ -15,9 +15,7 @@
          (.entrySet)
          (reduce
            (fn [m [k v]]
-             ; TODO: perhaps we should be doing (keyword k) instead? i don't like that it technically is not an
-             ;       exact conversion if we do it that way though, even if it is more idiomatic for clojure ...
-             (assoc m k (to-clojure v)))
+             (assoc m (to-clojure k) (to-clojure v)))
            {})))
 
   java.lang.Number
@@ -36,6 +34,10 @@
   (to-clojure [x]
     x)
 
+  clojure.lang.Keyword
+  (to-clojure [x]
+    x)
+
   java.lang.Object
   (to-clojure [x]
     (-> x
@@ -80,4 +82,4 @@
 (defn clojure->java
   "converts a clojure value to an equivalent value using a java object"
   [x]
-  (to-java x))
+  (to-java x))